Gottfried de Purucker () was a longtime resident of theTheosophical Society based in Point Loma and was Leader of that. GOTTFRIED DE PURUCKER was born in at Suffern, New York, son of a prominent Anglican minister who for some years served as chaplain of the. Articles about Gottfried de Purucker, leader of the Theosophical Society , a his clear exposition of theosophy.
|Published (Last):||7 July 2016|
|PDF File Size:||10.95 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.10 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article. Of the Theosophical literature, he said: He destroys the illusion that for all things large or small, high or low, there is an identical Parabrahman.
Part of a series on Theosophy Theosophy Traditional Theosophy. The book is, manifestly, an attempt on Dr. I was more compelled to comment on the comments below, as I too had gotten distracted by a side issue.
Morris wants to know. They crave, they long for, a Theosophical Leader and Teacher whom they can trust; …. In the words of Purucker: Few take note that if H. Para param used when declined does not denote any object whatsoever.
The impersonal and nameless universal Principle.
This is the authentic Theosophical teaching and part of the Wisdom-Religion of all ages. Also sloka 3 of the 8th discourse: From that time forward, Purucker taught classes, gave lectures and wrote several works on Theosophy. If I can only infuse into the membership of our Society all over the world, the enthusiasm, the power, the Lodge-force, that is now pouring through me, our successes will be unspeakably brilliant!
.: Links to Theosophical Texts Online :.
Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at [[: On no single subject have the Masters, H.
Para Declined optionally like a pronoun in nom. Notify me of new comments ds email.
Doubtless far better than I she succeeded in expressing it, to wit:. Several additional works were also published posthumously. I only hope that those critics will study my books, especially Fundamentals of the Esoteric Philosophyand my various answers to questions in the Theosophical Forumwith the same intelligent interest and skill in research that they have shown hitherto in trying to pick flaws in my presentation and explanation of H. Purucker, too, objected to it. These experiences led him to the Theosophical Societywhich he joined on August 16, The problem is that the vast majority of Point Loma and Pasadena Theosophists place much more emphasis on G.
Again, we ask no-one to take our word for it ve to discover for themselves whether what we say gottfgied true or not. Theosophical Society ] has been that Parabrahman is the Absolute, and how can there be more than one Absolute? You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation.
I also am keenly sensible of the fact that my critics do not realize that they are warring about words, because they have not understood the subtilty and enormous reach of this most important aspect of our Theosophical teaching, for it is in fact a fundamental if ever there was one! Which certainly goes the limit!
Notice how repetitively insistent Purucker is, puducker even these few short paragraphs, albeit always without providing any clear or solid evidence to support the oft repeated claim:.
HPB, greatly revered, is nevertheless viewed as having prepared the way for de Purucker and her own teachings always made subservient to his, no matter the discrepancies or contradictions. Thus do men become gods, and gods become worlds, and worlds become suns, and suns become universes, and universes in their infinitude make up the Absolute, who was once — a man.
They will question whether he is not overdoing the matter of infinities, up, down, north, south, east and west, and whether it is really true that every atom of the billions in a speck of dust, or an incomprehensible something associated with it, is going to develop into a god, into a Parabrahm, a super-Parabrahm, and to continue doing so world without end, a process which should certainly result in time in a horrible glut, crowding and elbowing of gods.
Views Read Edit View history.
Skip to content Some visitors to the site have asked questions about Gottfried de Puruckermore commonly known simply as G. Purucker recalls having at age 14 translated the entire New Testament from Greek, and at age 17 having translated the Book of Genesis from the Hebrew. Some visitors to the site have asked questions about Gottfried de Puruckermore commonly known simply as G.
No wonder they have been held secret and sacred in the ancient wisdom.
Gottfried de Purucker
There is no voting or elections. There is no way to separate what the Sages, the Mystery schools, the ancient scriptures, have stated, and what is his personal view, thought out by himself, or perhaps, in his opinion, derived from some supernatural source of inspiration.
We are in perfect agreement about the meaning of Brahma, Brahman, and Brahmaa. Besant he does not irrigate, he floods the field sown by H. Besant, what he has to say does not lead the student and inquirer from himself to H.
He died a few months later, on September 27, When preparing for the priesthood, he specialized in Hebrew, Latin and Greek. I have given the teaching as it was taught to me, and as I happen to know it to be true, and I also know and positively affirm that it is of course identic with the teaching that H.
We all admit that he has a perfect right to promulgate his philosophical theories as his own ; gottfrier many of us will feel bound to puruucker and protest when he advances propositions as being consistent with the Blavatsky teachings, although in fact directly contradicting them.
Brahma is identical to Brahman, the impersonal principle.
The Question of G. de Purucker – T H E O S O P H Y
His father was a priest for several years and has worked in Geneva and then in Rome and Strasbourg, while his mother came from a reputable family in New England. His legacy includes several publications, including elucidations of the writings of Helena Blavatsky. Now, approaching 70 years, I understand the actually ineffable gortfried of the One principle.